Home

Advertisement

Customize

I'm sorry Pitchfork...

Mar. 31st, 2009 | 01:12 pm

Now, lest you, imaginary reader that is, be sensitive to criticisms of the Pitchfork status quo I urge you to immediately turn away from your monitor for , what you may perceive as( sensitive as you are), invidious remarks are on the way. I have a confession to make, a guilty confession as well. Hitherto, people, like a gay man trying to make himself  go straight I have been likewise striving to appreciate certain Pitchfork rated bands in a self defeating cycle of personal fraud. Nodding at the required time, talking of how highly I rate the new album (as it got a 9.6 rating even though I only listened to two songs and of those two only half liked one of them). No more though, I will say it, I now must say it! I do not like, and/ or really appreciate as much as I ought to, LCD Soundsystem and the Animal Collective. Phew, what a sense of relief!

In fact, I will go further in saying that I do not like most modern electrical dancy type bands that experiment with contemporary and novel approaches in the production of avant garde music. I am a traditionalist in many ways at heart. Music for me is about good lyrics, emotional evocation and a good melody. If a song transfers me to a place I have long forgotten or excites me; if it can bring me to understand , intangibly and incomprehensively, something I had till then knew nothing of; if it can get me moving and appreciating the gentleness and potential of life: then it is, for me, serving the purpose that music was intended for. All this with an organic beat and acoustic feel and I am certainly all the more overjoyed. LCD, you must now see, just don’t satisfy these requirements..

Hell, but this is probably just me though. James, the young yet old gleeful atavist who still doesn't have a facebook account yet somehow manages to live (or rather, you may see it, endure) regardless. Still cursing the end of the commons whilst rocking on my chair by the fire, stick in hand, shouting on how the Luddites are history's real forgotten heroes... No, LCD I just cannot feign to like: far too trendy and hedonistic. Animal Collective, not as bad, but, still, no, they just won't do.

Sufjan Stevens is one person that I do think is good though. In fact along with Jeff Buckley, Jeffrey Lewis, Elliot Smith and Radiohead, I simply cannot get enough of him. Espers is another good band as well of the type I do appreciate, full of new folk vibes but I simply couldn’t put them in the epic category of the former group. Sufjan is, I think, incomparable and is the one true musical genius we have at present (of my genre of appreciation I importantly must add, although I could even argue that this man transcends genres although I am reluctant to really say this too loudly as it whiffs of being the certain type of obsessive proselytizing acolyte that I probably am, yet don’t wish to recognise). He sings with gentle compassion and understanding to the backing of often incredibly complex orchestral and sometimes simple pieces alike with lyrics that wouldn't seem out of place in one of those poetic compendiums that the poets Heaney and Hughes were so inclined to produce( here I must recommend their shared endeavour,” The Rattle Bag”, as something worth checking out ).

To give one example of the genius of Sufjan, I am going to briefly discuss one of his best songs in my opinion, “John Wayne Gacy Jr" a song about the infamous Chicago serial killer who picked up and abducted boys and thereafter horrifically raped and murdered them. He then buried many of the bodies under the floorboards of his own house . An even more sickening side, if this is even possible, to this was exhibited by the fact that this man was well known in the locality for his amicability and would dress up as a clown to entertain the local children. Now, firstly, such subject matter is almost unheard of in contemporary music; almost taboo really. Yet even with such a sensitive subject matter Sufjan manages to produce something that does justice to the portrayal of such a horrific act whilst still managing to foster some rudimentary understanding of such an utterly terrible series of acts.

The song itself has a beautiful melody and haunting chorus that creates a sense of deep sadness and loss. Sufjan sets the scene by speaking of how the serial killers father was a drinker and his mother cried in bed.  This establishing a base not of judgement, nor horror and blame at the wrong doer as would be expected, but of transcendent understanding. We are then told of how his mother would fold the young John Gacy’s T shirts when the swing set hit his head (this alluding to an actual incident in Gacy’s life whereby he suffered severe head trauma as a kid when such a thing happened to him). This is a beautiful image of the simple everyday love of a mother that reminds me of a line in the poem "Autobiography" by Belfast's Louise MacNeise which goes:  " My mother wore a yellow dress: gently, gently, gentleness ”. It does a lot to humanize someone who many would see to be a born monster.


The song then continues with the powerfully mournful chorus of oh my God ”, and then asks: “are you one of them?” A strange question here that I take to mean, have I, the listener that is, been in some way killed by the actions of this man as an act like this affects us all. He furthers this idea by then saying how Gacy’s actions would not just kill those who he murdered but that “he’d kill ten thousand people” . This emphasises how, of course, families, friends and neighbours would also be in their own real way killed by his actions. This is an important aspect that is often overlooked in such atrocities. Yet, the part of the song that I found most profound and uncanny in modern music was Sufjan’s personal confession at the end which really works as a confession for all of us when it earnestly asks :

“And in my best behaviour

I am really just like him?

Look underneath the floorboards

For the secrets I have hid.”

 This sentiment reminds me a lot of the famous Kahil Gibran who said in his book “The Prophet”, on the subject of crime:

“So as the wicked and the weak cannot fall lower than the lowest which is in you also.

 And as a single leaf turns not yellow but with the silent knowledge of the tree,

So the wrong-doer cannot do wrong without the hidden will of you all. “

What this is asking and saying is that when we really look at ourselves, truly and deeply, we are capable of any action that any other human can do as we all have a shared humanity. A profound cogitation really this and one that our society tries its best to avoid and ignore but one that Sufjan here again offers for our consideration concluding the song with it for us.

Quite an aside all this I know from my brief initial discourse on my relative disdain for LCD and their ilk. However, I suppose in detailing why I think Sufjan is so great it in many ways implicitly shows why I find so much of the Pitchfork super stars to be lacking. Musical ingenuity and experimentation is good I suppose; but, a man cannot live on bread alone as you all know. Trendiness, this omnipresent force, and something that seems to fuel Pitchfork like LSD did the 60’s, is something that I shall have to write upon another day as a lot needs to be said on it really. Finally, I must admit that Pitchfork are pretty good regardless and that they also highly rate Sufjan. What I do essentially seek to get across is that next time you see an album there that is rated over 9.6 all I ask is that you try and listen to it objectively and that if you don’t actually like it as much as you are supposed to , well then, say it! Stand up and be counted! Your nation needs you.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Finding a lobster in unusual places...

Mar. 29th, 2009 | 07:23 pm


Recently I went for the Driving Theory Test, an unforgettably dull and tedious experience for me. Rarely had I encountered such mental resistance in all my endeavors before as it was with learning how to differentiate between different signs and hazards. It wasn't so much that I found it hard to learn really though but, rather, that I found it hard to convince my brain that the knowledge was, in fact, worthwhile in acquiring. Incredibly, I actually passed the test in the end.

When I was then presented with my Certificate my toil and troubles were all unquestionably justified by a piece of everyday real and simple hilarity that would challenge any piece of contrived comic material that you can find. In a mundane world of traffic signs and signals; of formal computer exams seeking knowledge on tire thread lengths, and of the stinking multi-national Corporation that  runs it (there were ,maybe, 15 CCTV cameras in the small room where I was questioned...) there is a bit of humanity in the form of a funny coincidence. The Theory Test Manger for Ireland whose name is on all certificates is none other than, of course, F Skidmore. What can I say? Some men are obviously born to do certain things.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

If I ever set up a movement...

Apr. 20th, 2008 | 12:12 pm

... this will be my manifesto and call to arms:

 

An artistic vision

 

A shared energy arises; more so a longing.

We see it as a calling.

To unleash the feelings caused

By the lack of significance felt

In a world apparently bent

On mindlessly wreaking its own destruction.

 

A call to action, to arms, to aid…

A call to, something , other than passivity.

A plea, even, for hospitality

And, above all, humanity.

Simplicity for the overstimulated.

Honesty for the complexed.

 

So to Cassady, Caulfield, Snyder and Laing

We seek to catch up where you left off.

So through madness, folly, songs and stories

We'll get on that train that is bound for glory,

And so bring everyone else along.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Summer 2007

Dec. 14th, 2007 | 07:41 pm

 

 

Introduction


O but I had a horrible itch! One that no ointment could ameliorate nor could any lotion purge. A most primordial itch of which all share yet most subconsciously repress. It was the itch which forces us (paraphrasing W.B Yeats) "to wander where we will". We are nomads and this we all do know. Yet we are sadly forced to ignore this by a society that fosters stagnation (through television, glitz and glamour and all the myriad other external niceties we produce and consume on a daily basis) to repress all knowledge of this. So off I went, with my most favoured of all inventions (save for maybe the teapot of course): the bicycle. Packed it I did with a few bits of clothes, a gas cooker, some pans, writing material and a copy of the book "Wild: an elemental journey" by Jay Griffiths. It was that easy!




 Explanation



  I amn't too interested in compiling a completely chronological detailing of the events of my journey here as, firstly, it would bore me beyond belief to do so and ,secondly, I don't really see time as a linear process nor do my thoughts follow linear patterns. What I will seek to produce is a compilation of cogitations, insights, stories and nonsense in no particular order but that which comes to me. I may also update this from time to time when I feel up to it.




 Wet Wet Wales



 Starting in Llandudno with Kieran we set up camp the first night in the most incredibly beautiful spot near Betws-y-Coed. We were camped over an old lead mine that had been recently transmuted into a lake surrounded by forests. Where people had once toiled and died untimely deaths now a beautiful reserve had been created.  I couldn't believe the contrast from where I had been a few hours before in Piccadilly gardens, Manchester. Sat looking at this view I thought: this is where we should be. Where we all should be!

  The next day was among the hardest, physically, of my life. We crossed Snowdonia to Porthmadog. It was all worthwhile though when, after hours and hours of uphill crawling in first gear (there was one hill that was so steep that my bike kept on doing wheelies in an effort to get up it!), we finally got to the top and saw the sea from afar! It shook me. Flying down the other side at ridiculous speeds, I felt really alive; buzzing even. The next evening, I think, we then cycled up towards the Lynn Peninsula, and set up camp in a field, with two horses, by the coast path.

  That night I slept worse than almost any night in my life. There was a madness in my mind. I had ludicrous dreams about police and farmers coming in the middle of the night telling us to leave (in all the camping I did, this actually never happened...). I struggled the next day. You see, I hadn't washed in a while, was exhausted and was cold and wet. I had no time for the curious horses that came over to lick us as we took down our tents. I was trying to escape from my present reality by fighting the moment and escaping into an imaginary future. Never works that. Took me a while to learn that lesson, mind.

 

***

  Thinking about the above, I must enter a piece of writing by a Western Buddhist writer by the name of Rigdzin Shikpo on the topic, relaxing into enjoyment.

 

 “For most of us, enjoyment is a sense of surfing from peak to peak and ignoring everything in between. It is important to enjoy the whole experience, the way it fluctuates up and down, rather than always to be looking toward the next high spot, By letting the whole experience seep into us, we may find there is more to be discovered in the little “downs” than in the “ups”.

  On this cycle, due to the length of time I was away, I was forced to cease constantly grasping for the next high as often it was a long time in coming. On doing this, resistance to the present situation often disappeared for me, leading to a sense of things becoming more workable.

 

***



  Another person joined the trip after a while, Brooks. On one of the rainiest days in memory Kieran and I arrived in Porthmadog again to meet him. Soaked to the skin I called up to Pat, a friend who lives there, and luckily she was in. I say luckily as we would have had a long wait as Brooks was very late in coming. Pat cooked a great meal for us when we were there and I got a chance to shower and load up on tea. When Brooks came it was getting quite late and she even asked us if we wished to stay the night. Small mind said "YES!” big mind said nothing knowing that wasn't what the trip was about. Off we went into the rain and soon found a forest where we all hid in the tent drinking whiskey in rounds.

  I almost forgot to mention Portmeirion and its heavenly gardens (I have always preferred gardens to buildings). This is a surreal Italian style resort village (hard to describe the place, I tell you) near Portmadog designed by Clough Williams-Ellis famous for being the location of the even more surreal TV show, The Prisoner. It was one of the highlights of the start of the trip.




 Loom of the moon



 After Brecon and on the way to Abergavenny we set up camp by a canal and, amazingly, for the very first time on this trip, had a campfire. The night was warm and gentle with an air of palpable stillness like that of being inside an old cathedral. We sat by the fire in unrewarding loquacious cacophony until we concurred that silence would be more in keeping with the night. An hour perhaps we sat in silence watching the dance of the fire upon the wood. At about midnight Brooks headed back to the tent leaving me and the fire together.

  Later, I got up and walked to the canal being surprizingly greeted by none other than the rare, but always welcome, presence of the full moon. It shone perfectly onto the still canal water making it seem like there was not one but two moons!  I was left thinking of perhaps my favourite Zen koan :

  The Moon Cannot Be Stolen 


Ryokan, a Zen master, lived the simplest kind of life in a little hut at the foot of a mountain. One evening a thief visited the hut only to discover there was nothing to steal. 

Ryokan returned and caught him. "You have come a long way to visit me," he told the prowler, "and you should not return empty-handed. Please take my clothes as a gift." 

The thief was bewildered. He took the clothes and slunk away.   

Ryoken sat naked, watching the moon. "Poor fellow," he mused, "I wish I could have given him this beautiful moon."




 There’s Synchronicity aplenty when out of the city




   It was in Bath that Brooks decided to finish his journeying and to head homeward bound. After three weeks or so of cycling with him and being in his company it was strange to say bye to him; it was also stranger still to think that from now on I would be by myself. As for where I would go next I was thinking of getting to Glastonbury but, for some reason, had the idea of cycling to Cheddar. Brooks and I joked at the reason that I wanted to go there: I had once met someone who lived there, that was it! However, nonetheless I felt like I should check it out. In the end I decided to go straight to Glastonbury though as it was out of the way.

  It was a remarkably warm day as I cycled. After a few hours I was getting tired and decided to stop in a small town called Radstock. As I cycled down the hill, strangely, my pannier fell off my bike onto the road. I then decided to go down to a nearby tree so as to get some shade from the now oppressive sun. I wasn't long there when I was approached by a man that was certainly unlike the type the person you would expect to meet in a small Somerset town: dishevelled long hair , old tartan kilt; went by name the Jules(alright maybe you might expect the last one)... I got talking anyhow and offered him some of my food. A minute later his friend, Brian, originally from Bray in Ireland, came over and we got to more talking.

  It turned out that they were going to, of all places, Cheddar and had come from Bethnal Green to get there. There was a festival on there called the Big Green Gathering which I had once briefly heard of but knew very little about. I told them that I would love to go to it but for monetary reasons it was impossible. As it turned out with Jules most things are possible and he told me to throw my bike into his trailer (he had a huge trailer attached to the back of his van that had the most incredible array of general items I have ever seen. There was wooden flag poles, guitars aplenty, saxophones, gorilla suits, bits of trees, herbs, other bikes, spanners ... It was surreal!). He said that he had some connections there and that he could get me in for free if I was lucky. I said, fuck it, I'll take the chance. Thus began the most surreal and exciting part of my trip.

  Jules was perhaps the most spontaneous person I have ever met; a complete eccentric that didn't care in the slightest about the opinion of others. On the drive to the festival he often suddenly parked the car more or less in the middle of the road to pull stuff off trees or climb them and was always shouting to folk along the way( in a friendly way of course). It was great to see that society's stranglehold isn't all encompassing!
 
  Finally, getting to the Car park of the Green Gathering, I sat with Brian, a really easy and interesting person to talk to, while we waited for Jules to get us some wrist bands. After only twenty minutes or so I was sure I saw a familiar face to the right of the car and was hit with a sense of intense incredulity when I recognised who it was: Seamus from Manchester (an Irish guy who now lives a few doors down from me) and his friend Claire! I ran over to him and I think he was as shocked as myself by the meeting! On a last minute decision he had decided to come down, he told me. I told him my story and later, after Jules had gotten me in, we pitched out tents up beside each other as we bathed in the unparelled experience that was the Gathering.

  As I wrote in my diaries at the time of the Gathering, in a very lonely planet type of way, it was: “a spectacular gathering of human diversity and vivacious vaudeville all within a ludic sphere of tolerance and understanding. A great antidote to the perils of modernity! ". I had many noteworthy experiences at this festival and to make an account of them all would prove to be an excessively voluminous tack. So, rather, I'll pick out some of the most interesting and significant bits and elaborate a bit on them.



 Music and Madness on the Mendip Hills



 One day as I was wandering aimlessly about the festival site I came across a tent called “Evolving minds".  It caught my attention and on inquiring I discovered that there was a workshop beginning there in a short amount of time. It was by a self proclaimed Shaman ( I say this as there is no Shamanic GMC equivalent so I suppose all Western shamans are only shamans because they say they are) who was ostensibly doing a workshop on confidence and perception or something along those lines.

 On sitting down in the tent I was immediately surprized to see beside me a girl I had meet months previously whilst visiting a commune called Brithdir Mawr in Mid-Wales who's name, unfortunately, I cannot remember but could have been, and now for all intents and purposes will be, Laura. The class then began and the only other person that really stood out at the group was another girl who sat adjacent to me who had a Tibetan Singing Bowl with her. The man, who ran the workshop, originally from Nigeria, proved to be quite interesting unlike the tasks we had to do: describe twenty or so stones and then listen to the others descriptions of the stones. This lithological investigation took ages to complete and although my stone related descriptive skills increased as the stones rolled the whole exercise was so abstract that I couldn't exactly describe everything with , you know, lapidary precision ( amn't I clever, eh?) Nearing the end of the exercise I could but describe the stones as either: “light” or “heavy” due to my adjective inertia! I did get something out of the whole thing though although it’s hard to describe what that was. I suppose it was something about recognising how other people perceive similar things in completely different ways. To illustrate I remember seeing a stone that I actually quite liked. I said this to the group only to discover that Laura actually detested the very same stone. Ways of seeing I suppose.

 Later that evening I bumped into Laura again with Seamus and we ended up hanging out for the evening/ night. I cannot remember exactly what occurred but it was a great night culminating, as all great nights should, mesmerized in front of a huge fire alternatively gazing at the morphological manifestations of the flames and then the astrological illuminations of the stars.  All the while thinking frayed thoughts on, of course, eschatological matters. Humanity has lost a lot with the loss of the open fire.

  The next day, I was wandering around, playing the role of festival flaneur when I bumped into the girl with the Tibetan Singing Bowl that I had met before. Anna was her name. I had, just before, bumped into a person from Manchester that I only barely knew- whom I, interestingly, never saw again after that day- who told me of a talk on Sufism that I should go to. This I informed Anna of and off we then went.

  It was an evening event of Sufi Story telling (Sufism being the esoteric aspect of Islam that strongly emphasises love and the cultivation thereof) by an incredibly powerful, if at times- although rarely but not rarely enough to ignore -histrionic speaker, who beautifully told the mystical stories of the life of Rumi (an important Sufi poet) with a gentle backdrop of simple music that he also played on a guitar type instrument. The stories were captivating and reminded me acutely of Zen koans; so much so that I will have to detail one such story ( about the teaching of Rumi's teacher and spiritual lover, Nasrudin : 

    The Sermon of Nasrudin

  

"One day the villagers thought they would play a joke on Nasrudin. As he was supposed to be a holy man of some ineffable sort, they went to him and asked him to preach a sermon in their mosque. He agreed.  When the day came, Nasrudin mounted the pulpit and spoke:          

"O people! Do you know what I am going to tell you?"          

"No, we do not know," they cried.          

"Until you know, I cannot say. You are too ignorant to make a start on," said the Mulla, overcome with indignation that such ignorant people should waste his time. He descended from the pulpit and went home.          

Slightly chagrined, a deputation went to his house again, and asked him to preach the following Friday, the day of prayer.          

Nasrudin started his sermon the same way as he had before. This time, the         congregation answered as one:          

"Yes, we know."          

"In that case," said the Mulla, "there is no need for me to detain you any longer. You may go." And he returned home.          

Having been prevailed upon to preach for the third Friday in succession, he started his address as before:          

"Do you know or do you not?"          

The congregation was ready.          

"Some of us do, and others do not."          

"Excellent," said Nasrudin, "then let those who know communicate their knowledge to those who do not."          

And he went home. "



 

 

And death shall have no dominion

 

 Everywhere that you go in Wales you are constantly reminded of the inevitability of death. Graveyards are omnipresent as are the carcasses of car crushed animals by the roadside. There was simply no escaping this reality whilst out in the openness of the world. I suppose that this reality- this very real reality that we all spend vast portions of our lives trying to avoid- is in fact, on contemplation, rather liberating. This is the case with most truths.

 

  I felt forced to focus more on the present moment; the only thing that is actually, verifiably, real. The present moment: all that we have. Just think about it: the culmination of every process that has ever occurred in all of universal history is happening-now! There, verily, is no where else to be Sitting by the riverside, somewhere, I wrote:

 

Now is all that we have;

This itch and this thought.

This word and this, here.

 

Yet verily we have nothing

For in thinking we have

Haven’t we lost now?

 

 

 

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Article written for Mediscope mag

Oct. 2nd, 2007 | 07:20 pm

 

Climate change and public health

 

  There are few contemporary issues as ubiquitous as that of climate change1, 2. Yet, even with all this coverage of its current and potential implications, we are in a rather peculiar situation insofar as real action on it seems extremely slow if not completely absent. Seemingly, we are in a state of denial towards a problem that, if left unchecked, could lead to a catastrophe on par with nuclear war3!  

 

 What is the correlation between this and medicine however, you may be asking? The answer is that climate change cannot be separated from its public health implications. People are already suffering from its effects and the future impact has been predicted to include changing food production worldwide and associated malnutrition; an increase in tropical diseases and waterborne illnesses and a generally increased worldwide burden of illness4 We in the UK will also be unable to escape the effects5 and it will be our generation of medical students that will have to treat those affected.

 

 This leads to the question: what can we do? Firstly, and most importantly, we must realize that there is still scope for change as, unlike many other public health issues, we have the possibility to hugely mitigate the effects of this potential disaster. However, this action must occur now; and this is why action on climate change carries with it such a sense of urgency. As terrible as all this sounds there is hope as we have the potential to actually at best stop, and, at worst, reduce this problem. In fact, I think we have a duty to do something about this problem as by ignoring it we are in fact accepting it.

 

 What can we as medical students then do to tackle the causes of climate change? It is easy to believe that individual actions such as cutting back on driving and/or buying local are solutions but one mustn’t be fooled into thinking that, laudable as these practices are, they will ever address a problem as huge as this. The only solution to a global problem like this is governmental action and government action that starts today. This could start by supporting the BMJ in its call for the implementation of a worldwide policy of carbon contraction and convergance2 or by joining pressure groups for change such as I count or Medact6. For further reading on policies for change in the UK I would recommend reading the report “Zero Carbon Britain”, produced by CAT7. Any action, we must remember, is better than no action.

 

 This summer I personally tried to do something by attending the Camp for Climate Action8 by Heathrow Airport which was set up to highlight the hypocrisy of a government that encourages us to change our light bulbs to more energy efficient ones whilst continuing to expand airports (the biggest growing contributor to Carbon emissions in the UK9). Many environmental activists as well as climate scientists and concerned people gathered to discuss strategies for change all demonstrating many differing ideas at how to avert this disaster. From my experience there, I have realized the ideas for change are abundant and that all we need is action.

 

 Climate change is but one example of our ruinous relationship with the natural environment but it is the most important element of it as it has the potential to fundamentally alter the viability of life on this planet. As future doctors we will be in a unique position to influence policy making in our respective areas and it is my view that this is why we should treat Climate change as the most pressing issue that there is. The clock is ticking but, even still, we shouldn’t underestimate the power that we have to effect the future direction of our planet. The quality of life of future generations and their health is very much in our hands.

 

 

1)       The anthropogenic basis of climate change is no longer debated within the scientific community; please see report of the Royal Society. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/downloaddoc.asp?id=1630

2)       Stott, Godlee. What should we do about climate change? Health Professions need to act now both collectively and individually. BMJ  2006;333:983-984 (11 November)

3)       Comparison made in the most recent report of the International Institute for Strategic Studies. http://www.iiss.org.uk/

4)       WHO climate and health fact sheet. http://www.who.int/globalchange/news/fsclimandhealth/en/index.html.

5)       Parliamentary office of Science and Technology report. UK Health Implication of Climate Change http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/POSTpn232.pdf)

6)       See http://www.icount.org.uk/ or http://www.medact.org/

7)       CAT is the Centre for Alternative Technology and their report can be seen at http://www.zerocarbonbritain.com/ 

8)       Website for the Camp for Climate Action. http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/

9)       Tyndall Centre for climate change research report: “Contraction and convergence UK Carbon emissions and the implications for UK air traffic”. http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/research/theme2/final_reports/t3_23.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link | Leave a comment {7} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

When the pig pokes his snout

May. 3rd, 2007 | 03:20 pm



  In traditional Tibetan houses the farm animals live downstairs whilst the people live upstairs or so I learned from Alan Wallace, a long time Tibetan Buddhist practitioner, in something I read by him. Whether it is completely true or not, I don’t know but let’s just say that it is. Considering this, it is not hard to imagine that, once in a while, the animals do so happen to stray where they shouldn’t: upstairs. Wallace describes the solution:

“What do you do when a pig pokes his snout through the kitchen door looking for stuff to munch? Hit him on the nose before he gets the other 200 pounds through the door! Hit the pig on the nose quick enough and he turns tail. But a pig that is already feeding at the trough is hard to get rid of”.

   Why am I talking about hitting pigs you may rightly be wondering? This followed by a belief that there’s no place for the advocation of animal cruelty in Bodhi magazine! And right you are on both counts. This, you see, is actually a clever analogy that is also particularly apt whereby the pig symbolises the negative mental habits that lead, invariably, to suffering. Wallace follows:

... As soon as you identify afflictive tendencies of the mind, as soon as their snouts poke through the door of your mind, hit them on the nose... These are not abstract philosophical concepts." (Wallace, Buddhism With An Attitude, Snow Lion, 2001, p.220)”

   Now this story is, if anything, most illuminating to me as it corresponds to many insights I have discovered whilst observing my own mind and its associated emotional manifestations. Often a feeling of, say, hatred appears in my mind whereby, without some manner of adroit mental effort to counter it, it can then enlarge and enlarge causing an intense amount of mental anguish. The pig has got in!

   This pig is clever however and with feelings that arise, such as depression, one can almost be convinced that it is not worth struggling against as it is all pointless anyhow. This is logically absurd for when depression arises we start to suffer but somehow- due to the unique nature of depression- we manage to convince ourselves that further suffering is not worth fighting against. Somehow we convince ourselves that we should suffer; that we deserve to suffer. I believe that we have a responsibility not to suffer.

   This is not to suggest, as the Victorians may have, that depression is somehow caused by mental frailty or some other such nonsense that they loved espousing. I would hate to suggest such an absurd and callous thing. However, what I do wish to get across is that, through the practice of mindfulness (or Sati as it is known in Theravada countries), one can slowly come to realise that there is a possibility, at times, of stopping the negative emotions before they inflame the mind. Also, it stresses the crucial importance of spotting the arising of negative emotions before they develop. Nipping them in the bud, so to speak.

  This observation is not just the preserve of Buddhism as modern psychology and especially the treatment of cogitative behavioural therapy (CBT) says the same thing in trying to get the patient to look for mental triggers that generate negative views of the self, their current situation or the future. Yet, without proper mindfulness training this can be a futile battle as by the time one realises that an emotion has arisen it can be too late.

 

 Another reason why this analogy is so accurate to me is that the negative emotions must really be hit and hit hard when they are recognised. This requires mental toughness and can often seem like an impossible battle. However, as with all battles there will be defeats and victories; these are irrelevant. The most important aspect is a strong determination not to suffer and not to allow oneself to purposely increase one’s own suffering. Mental habits are extremely strong and one cannot expect to overcome mental traits that have been acted on for years in a single evening; that’s simply not realistic. What is important is taking the responsibility onto oneself that, where possible, if mental suffering can be avoided or fought against then this must be done.

 

  Now the question must be asked, why do we develop so much fear and negative mental emotions? To this I cannot conclusively answer but I do have some nascent ideas on it. Carl Jung once said that neurosis is always a substitute for legitimate suffering." Most mental afflictions are caused by a desire not to feel certain things and of all these things the main one has to be that of suffering. Yet the truth of life is that we cannot avoid suffering. We, however, do not wish to accept this and in an effort to fight against the reality of suffering we cause ourselves all manner of difficulties. In essence, our fight against the reality of suffering perversely causes ourselves infinitely more suffering than we would have ever experienced had we simply faced the suffering.

 

  There is a Tibetan saying which goes:  if you want to look at how your life has been look at your body but if you wish to look at how the future will be then look at your mind. What this strives to explain is that each mental decision we make has an impact and if we make mental decision that challenge negative emotions today then we can be sure that, although we may notice no difference initially, gradually a change will arise. The battle may, at times, feel pointless but as long as a fighting spirit is there we can be sure that we will reap the rewards of our efforts. I would stress to say as that this isn’t a matter of faith at all as one can empirically observe the changes to one’s habitual thought patterns over time.

 

  As the Buddha says at the beginning of the Dhammapada: “Mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with a pure mind a person speaks or acts happiness follows him like his never-departing shadow.” This shows the importance of the battle against negative mental afflictions as, ultimately, our very happiness is at stake. There really is no alternative! Get your stick ready and start whacking!

 

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Random writing #1

Apr. 26th, 2007 | 04:07 pm



Looking for a quiet redemption


There I stood, looking for that which I may never have; may never attain. Nonetheless I did not move and would have stayed there for ever if it wasn’t for him. His very name scalds my heart. The very thought of him harms my mind. Yet, I was forced to make my acquaintance with him, by the unavoidable reason that he, you see, was me.


What do the trolleys do when we close?

At the end of an average supermarket day thousands of trolleys are left to dwell alone as us shoppers no longer need them. All night long they wait for us. We never come, well not until morning. What do they do? Who cares for them? Does anyone care?


-In desperate times do arise disparate thoughts-


The game is up!

I daren’t look into his eyes; afraid by that which I may see. Yet, I looked anyhow and, sadly, were it the end of my days and I had but one wish, it would be to go back on that decision. He gazed at me, but it seemed more like it was into me. He saw me all, naked as the day I was born, but also all the things I have harboured over the years- all of it. And I knew too that he could see all this, and that- worse still- he knew that I knew.

Exposed I was and unable to do anything. He continued to gaze. Embarrassment , fear, prejudice and perverseness; all this he saw and more. My habitual shield was down. Then, he looked and walked away nodding slowly. I couldn’t move. Nodding slowly he left. The sage, he left and left I was. Left trying to put back the pieces of my elaborate mental façade knowing that I had been seen through.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

The Letting Go

Apr. 22nd, 2007 | 05:50 pm

When I first established an interest in Buddhism I saw it as a novel and beautiful method for getting me somewhere. Its philosophies were so elegant and were also in agreement with most insights that I had made on life. “This is it!” I must have thought. “Follow this and I will have all I want, I can do some practice now and then and, hey presto, I will become a better person!”

Many years of practice (and, of course, weeks/months of non-practice) later I have come to the conclusion that my beginning impressions of Buddhism were rather unrealistic, to say the very least. My view of Buddhism was rather in line with that of adopting a further world view that would correct my previously incorrect world view. It would be the gaining of a supreme worldview that allowed for me to become some manner of Supreme Being; some type of Super James! A fellow that meditates by night and then, by day, saves the world from itself in a Jesus at the Market place kind of way. I was looking for the extraordinary.

Yet, Buddhism is all about the ordinary. It is all about finding simplicity in life for life is, in essence, simple. In fact it is painfully simple. Yet we have, through our habitual thought patterns, made so much complexity out of it. We somehow know that we have done this as well but are just too scared to see this as, perversely, we are deeply afraid of losing our worldviews for we see them not as hindrances to happiness but as means of protecting us from the world. Our worldviews are what Trungpa Rinpoche called our “cocoons”: something that we think keeps us safe but, in fact, serve only to isolate ourselves from the world.

I once heard it said, in rather poetic manner, that humans are, essentially, creatures, lying naked, between the Sky and the Earth. We are born, we live for a very short while and then, inevitably, we die. Yet, we attach such significance to all of our activities! We have crafted the most convoluted and delicate ideologies out of this simplicity and it is this, I believe, that accounts for so much of our unhappiness. This is why I now see Buddhism as a letting go, or – to quote the musician Will Oldham’s latest album- “The Letting Go”.

To me Buddhism is the letting go, ever so slowly, of all the nonsense we have created about reality that not only has no basis in reality but also serves as an affront to us enjoying life. However, it is most difficult to stop deceiving ourselves as, for years, we have done so as an erroneous means of protecting ourselves from reality. It could be said that this is one of the most difficult endeavours to ask of a person. Yet, I believe that it is essential.

So, how do we begin “The Letting Go”? Meditation, I believe, is key. Yet one must also apply the insights gained in meditation to daily life and then actually challenge their own perceived view of how the world works. This is extremely difficult but it is also extremely gratifying as one slowly learns that things in life aren’t as fixed as they believe and that there is a lot of scope for movement in life. The main obstacle faced in this however is, of course, fear.

Habitually we often succumb to fear by avoiding things that initiate it. However, it is my belief that most forms of fear, save for obviously protective types, spring from a challenge to our world view and the view that everything in our carefully crafted world could collapse. Letting go of our worldviews involves facing a lot of fear. Also, and importantly, it means accepting fear, not avoiding it, when it does arise. A view that we can live without fear is unfounded in reality.


The letting go can also mean challenging universally accepted truths in our society that aren’t in accord with reality but that we have learned to accept. These beliefs range from thinking that an economic system based on infinite economic growth in a finite world is anything but insane, or that buying things can make us happy. It means challenging a worldview that put intangible profits above the planet and its inhabitants. It also means challenging common views on the absolute importance of human beings over other creatures. Often we refuse to see things as they are as we are afraid of the repercussions of this. Yet one cannot peacefully meditate on a cushion whilst the world is falling to pieces!

There is nothing to gain, nothing to do. Simplicity doesn’t mean becoming a simpleton though. More so it means letting go of nonsense, of our insanity and then re-connecting to our basic sanity. However, it cannot be forced. One cannot force one’s worldview to change at all. I believe, from my own experience that most change comes both slowly and unexpectedly. It is the motivation to see things as they are; to let go of nonsense, that is all important.

What I have learned is that rather than searching for the extraordinary we should really be searching for the extra ordinary. However, to finish on another quote by Trungpa Rinpoche: “when you live life in a thoroughly ordinary way, it is extraordinary.” It is this apparent dichotomy that I challenge you to investigate.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Short Story

Apr. 22nd, 2007 | 05:49 pm

Glass twinkled towards my hazy eye from its scattered splendour upon the pavement as I, in my drunken stupor, blithely walked home. Thoughts sped through my mind ever so slightly commingling with the external environment that I was forced to bare witness. Yet, I was nearly home. One leg ahead of the other. By God, I was nearly there.

- As clean as a new pin! Sure what would dirty a pen? A pencil perhaps but there’d be badness in a man were he to go around the place blackening pins with pencils; awful badness.

- Old sayings, why do I always think of them? Who am I that does be thinking? A drunken buffoon, a gormless reprobate. Oh, I like that. Yet, who am I talking to?

- You know, I am going to do it. All that has been holding me back is no more. Life you just wait and see. You just wait for me. Ah, but will I? I will! No, no ‘tis only the drink talking, ah bed!


My muscles struggled against the winter cold, tensing in a futile effort to warm up. My peregrination was coming to an end as I spotted a sign for Olney St., this meaning but two more streets to pass.


- Not a soul to be seen but, sure, why would there be? ‘Tis a queer old hour for any sort of fella to be out. What the fuck am I doing out here? Why do I do stupid things like this to my self? Drink is no good and I know that. Spent loads but gained nothing.

A girl gets out of a taxi. Adorned in typical Mancunian female Saturday night attire she saunters to her home.


- Another night in another terrible place for her I suppose. Another night out in this terrible place speaking lots, saying little. Who am I to judge? What gives me the right to say such things? O, but I am sickened that I can think such thoughts. If only every single girl in this world could enjoy themselves, and I mean really enjoy themselves. Like a child in a hayfield, in Holden’s hayfield!

My eyes tensed and a weight of sadness descended upon my frame. My throat tightened. I now saw my door and made way to it, opening it and then relishing in the warmth. Next, rushing on to the kitchen so as to slake my future thirst: a form of pre-emptive post-alcoholic rehydration followed by many sorry souls in my position. Then to bed, to sink, to sink into the bed!


- Sleep! You are my real saviour! My saviour from my self. When I awake this chemical haze will have departed and life will again begin. Let me not think of anything now but sleep for all but will sadden my sullen heart.


- Sleep, let me now peacefully enter your embrace where I can enter a world without end, Amen! A world of forgiveness and forgetfulness. A world where I can converse to someone’s heart. A world where I am never alone. My preferred world. Let me not wake until all is well in this place. Let me rest. Scared to live and scared to die, I, just so wish to- lie.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

With Love to Geraldine

Jan. 7th, 2007 | 03:27 pm

This next poem is about my aunt , Geraldine who lived in a hell realm for most of her life and has suffered more than most people I have ever met. Her whole life is a study in the tragic and she ended up dieing at 45 years of age from obesity: a form of slow suicide for one who cares not of themselves. I was particularily emotionally charged when I wrote it which, methinks, should be quite clear to you.



With Love To Geraldine



O, but your death was a cruel one.

O, but it was so much like your life.

A cruel burden that had you undone;

One imposed since before you begun.

Instilled in your heart by a family intent on havoc.



You brave soul though, you carried it through.

Although, often, did its might almost bury you.

Trapped in a hell realm you were.

All the time the talkers talked, watched, saw, and knew.



And the talkers so did they grace us

With their ostensible tears of mourning

On news of your departure from your calling.



A calling insofar as to show what can happen

When a culture can harden itself to what it sees.

When for fear of dis-ease, they speak of this hardness

Like a light, country breeze: there but not there at all.



Yet Geraldine, it was this hardness that killed you.

And still, my gentle Aunt, do they talk.

I will try and stop listening; I promise.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Avidly staring at the fire

Jan. 7th, 2007 | 03:26 pm

This poem was inspired by me sitting in front of an open fire in the dark in my father's house out in the countryside.


Avidly Staring At The Fire

O, how the flames ooze their transcient personas!
Some large,handsome but rather wistful,
Others shy,powerful - yet aloof!

And as I delve deeper into their flames
All I see is my mind, all the while
Burning and carefully casting new stories.

Yet as I wander deeper into my mind
All I see are the very same flames;
"Wherein lies this clever moulder", I wonder?

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Letter to editor of student Direct

Oct. 9th, 2006 | 03:59 pm

Dear Sir,

As much as I fear for the safety of students in the North Campus after reading your front page article in this weeks Student Direct(Issue 4 , 9/10), I must say that I was extremely disappointed with the reactionary views expressed towards the serious issue of prostitution in Manchester, views which I believe have done this paper a major discredit.

The article clearly illustrates that the writers share not an iota of understanding between them of prostitution in Manchester neither in regards its causation, effects or treatment (I infer this as none of these three were even commented upon save for the unclear “fact” that “in a great deal of contemporary examples, the arrival of prostitutes in an area has come(sic) coupled with drug use and violent crime”). This seems to suggest to me that these prostitutes are almost inhuman brutes who only bring all manner of horrible problems with them wherever they may go.

In passing it is mentioned by the “reporters”(I use this word lightly) that the traditional red-light district has been regenerated leading to a movement to the area around the North Campus. Should the prostitutes have just disappeared with the loss of their traditional area, as if by magic? It seems that this is what is being suggested. Further, why is it not mentioned that the real problem may lie with Manchester City Council for not taking this potential problem into account when planning the regeneration of the area around Piccadilly train station rather than with the prostitutes themselves?

Although I do recognise that this issue needs to be addressed I am saddened by the absolute lack of understanding that this article demonstrated. Prostitutes are some of the most vulnerable people in society whom it is very easy to demonize. Many have severe drug problems and very few become involved in this industry out of choice. In an effort to treat this issue what we need is a compassionate, caring and realistic approach to change, not, as this article infered, a “NIMBY” approach which leads the reader to believe that all that can be done is to scourge the area of the problem, not realising that it will not simply disappear until the issue of causation is addressed.

Yours,

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

After the collapse

Oct. 6th, 2006 | 12:24 am

The thread that holds this time together wears thin.
Each farmer buried by the weight of its changing markets;
Each child starved by the plight of economic realities
And each professional lead to medicate for want of
Its false and insipid aspirations, know.

They know that their plights lead to the destruction
Of its might, of its adhesiveness.
Each tragedy it bestows is like a caress
By the Global Blade of Reason along its
Weak point exposing its weak interior-
Slowly unraveling, until...
Snap!

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

A fictional scenario: " Logic vs emotion"

Jan. 21st, 2006 | 01:14 pm

And what of it? It was but an action. An action made by one who can make such actions. An arbitrary action made by a gene-preserving creature in a meaningless world, forced by virtue of my existence to remain until my body so perishes.

Let me hear no more talk of it! Nay! For what is good and bad but a measure brought to control the unruly mass that is humanity. A measure that changes over time so that foolish men muse over those before them, ignoring the implausibility of their own system.

I will have no more mention of it! All we have to look forward to is nothing. Nothing is the future. What mark could a simple action have upon anything; what mark could all actions have, when the one perpetrating them shall soon make the final exeunt from one form of insignificance to the pinnacle of it?

Please, I beg, say no more of it! Cease, stop, I plead! Cannot you understand how ridiculous our situation is? How pointless and useless we are?

Who can judge me for it? No-one. The sky now lies empty of the imagined gods of yore. Prayers stay unanswered, like heartfelt letters sent to the house of a dead man. All I do is but a useless gesture, far too pathetic to even bear consideration.

Yet, you still speak. Avoiding logic, reason and defeat. How can you still speak? You listen not and still you speak. O, my weary heart; why? Why do you cause me to weep?

Link | Leave a comment {3} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

A Talk by Dr. Raymond Tallis

Nov. 5th, 2005 | 07:59 pm

For quite a while now, I have been rather intrigued by questions regarding consciousness, and its ontological basis. In so far as, whether it is material-based phenomena (for most contemporary scientists/neurologists), or not so (for most religious beliefs, especially Buddhism). Of all the subjects worth studying, one would think that consciousness would predominate, considering it is something we all experience for all of our lives, every second, until we die. For, surely, if we don’t know ourselves, then why study other things? Yet, this is not how things have gone on, in the West at least, leading me to believe that all the current interest in consciousness is really quite promising. Accordingly, one can see that when I first heard of a talk on consciousness from a non-mainstream perspective, it didn’t take much convincing to get me going. And so I did.

The talk, by Dr Raymond Thallis, was entitled “Why the brain doesn’t explain the mind and why some people think it does”. Dr Tallis, a gerontologist at Hope Hospital Manchester, as well as a prolific author on subjects ranging from poetry and philosophy to his area of Medicine, with major research interests in stroke, epilepsy and neurological rehabilitation, was, in my opinion very well qualified to speak on such a topic. What follows is, a surmise of the talk from my perspective including some of his main arguments. Please bear in mind, however, that it is quite possible(in fact certain) that I misunderstood or will misstate some of his arguments, so , I suggest for those of you interested in really getting a true insight of his perspective on this matter, to read some of his books on this topic. Please do read on though!

To begin with, the two premises of modern neuroscience which are almost unchallenged are as follows: 1) Mental activity is neural activity; 2) Consciousness is due to activity in the brain. This, Dr Tallis, described as being nothing but, “neuromythology”, another facet of the contemporary belief in Scientism, which says that all, without exception, can be explained by Science. However, before beginning his critique, a presentation of the history leading to our current situation was given.

This began with, like most things in Western Medicine, Hippocrates, who maintained that the brain was where all our emotions, feelings etc come from. Although this may seem like quite a reasonable suggestion, we must bear in mind that at the time there was serious debate on the matter. To give an example, Aristotle, maintained that it was from the heart that thought came. As for the brain, it served only to cool the blood! Why this cerebral cooling notion was dropped we may never know! However, the brain-centred approach was then accepted. Yet, things weren’t as straightforward as accepting the brain in its entirety though. Next came the debate as to which part of the brain-parenchyma (actual body of brain) or ventricles (empty spaces in brain now shown to be responsible for the production of Cerebral Spinal Fluid)-was responsible. A brief discussion was then had on Franz Joseph Gall, father of phrenology(the science of determining character by feeling lumps on the skull which, incidentally, was used by the British in “proving” the inferiority of other races including the Irish), who was actually responsible for advancing science in it’s theories of the brain whatever about the validity of phrenology . This broader historical picture certainly made it much easier to see how we got where we are today.

With the framework established, Dr Tallis proceeded to explain current arguments regarding the perceived scientific fact that consciousness is the preserve of the brain. He began with the identity theory, which maintains that all neural events are identical to mental events. However, this he countered with arguments about the patent subjectivity of experience, and about such things as brightness and loudness. The latter, he explained, are not physical constructs. Atomically, without a conscious observer nothing can be loud or bright, thus such phenomena cannot be explained by simple physical neural excitement. Some may say that it is the patterns of neural excitement that allow for the range of experiences that we have, however if one thinks deeply of what a pattern is, one should find that it is non-existent without an already present observer. An example I can give of this is as follows: imagine seven asteroids moving in a line through space, each of them is set for a collision with a nearby planet. It is impossible for the planet, per se, to recognize a pattern of collisions by the seven asteroids. Only when there is an observer can patterns be established. If one says that these patterns activate further neurons which respond to specific patterns you will find that you have ultimately succumbed to a form of circular reasoning, as eventually the patterns will have to be recognized.

Next, an interesting argument known as the “levels” argument was elaborated upon. This tries to draw an analogy between the constituent water molecules and their product, water, to consciousness. For, just as millions of water molecules combine to form water, so is it with millions of nerve impulses combining to form consciousness.
According to Dr Tallis, the faults of this argument are as follows. Firstly, the concept of levels -neural activity level to consciousness level- requires levels of observation. This theory also doesn’t explain why some nerve impulses are conscious and why some aren’t. Further, this doesn’t explain why consciousness arises.

To show how ludicrous this is, consider the following (my example not that of Dr. Tallis): If you take the case that consciousness is believed to be an emergent phenomena (which it must be as part of the this “levels” argument”) then it must entail that each depolarizing neuron must have an intrinsic quasi-consciousness; that a simple action potential is in some, extremely minute way, conscious. No, scientist would accept such a thing, but, strangely, they except the idea of emergence quite easily.

The totality of consciousness was then discussed. This being the phenomena that we all share, in experiencing the hic et nunc with both lucidity and convergence of relevant sensory data. If one considers that the brain is said to be localized, in that certain areas of the brain are responsible for processing specific pieces of data (i.e. the neo-cortex is said to be responsible for higher mental function, whilst the brain stem deals with “sub-conscious” activities). This must mean that somehow the brain knows how to connect certain bits of data which are applicable to consciousness. However, when you investigate the somehow, one will see that an observer is needed. Why? An example the speaker gave was that if you considered a room of say forty people (about the amount of people at the talk) you will find that a certain number of them will have a low blood sugar level. The low blood sugar level by itself will not make itself self-evident. What is required is an observer who is actually looking for those with low blood sugar levels. Thus, without an observer it is very hard to see how converge of sensory data can occur.

Thus ended the main crux of the talk, although there was a few other issues discussed of which I have decided not to go into. In light of the above discussion, it is important to mention that the speaker himself doesn’t believe that neurons have no role in consciousness. In fact he made it very clear that he believes that a pre-requisite for consciousness is a fully functional brain, something that is clinically quite obvious. However, the two contentions of the “neuromythologists”, of which I stated at the beginning, are where his disagreements lay. Interestingly, when asked where he imagined that consciousness did in fact reside, he never uttered the word spirit or even alluded to a non-physical basis for consciousness. He suggested that the body could also have a role. I was rather surprised by this, as in my opinion, this is rather ludicrous-not that I don’t believe that the body has no role- as it is simply raising the physical basis for consciousness, the same problems of the lack of the observer in different experiences of which he so eloquently exposed is in no way ameliorated by this physically based extension of the causative elements in this consciousness conundrum. Perhaps, as he didn’t out rule such an aetiology, he doesn’t dismiss such a thing. Maybe, I will just have to read one of his books for find out more!

To conclude, I must say that I thoroughly enjoyed the talk. In fact, it was once of the best talks I have ever attended. It certainly has challenged many of my views on the topic. I think that of all the content of the talk one particular sentence that he said had the most profound impact on me. It went something like this: [without consciousness] “…the world is but a series of odour-less, colourless, atoms endlessly vibrating”. As physical entities have no characteristics of themselves, it is us that classify them. So, the question still remains, what is it that illuminates this inanimate world? I have a feeling that if I ever truly found out that I would be a changed person!

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Book Review: Kundalini by Gopi Krishna

Oct. 24th, 2005 | 04:57 pm

“Kundalini” by Gopi Krishna

Expectation. With every turn of page it rose, I was convinced that the author Gopi Krishna would illuminate my mind with tales of metaphysical feats far beyond the mundane, brought about by the awakening of this eponymous “Kundalini”. However, I was to be disappointed, as in this personal account of the awakening of Kundalini, the evolutionary energy of mankind, one’s impression of what spirituality can achieve will be severely altered, leaving a shattered but, importantly, corrected expectation. This being all important in this age of many self-proclaimed magical gurus, who claim all manner of psychic abilities, in an effort to attract followers, and, of course, money, to their cause.

For Gopi Krishna, this prana or life-force lies within us all and he believes that it is possible for each one of us to awaken it in ourselves. In fact, it is humankind’s destiny to do so. Thus, in this book, he describes his own experience of the awakening itself and the impact that it had on his life. Being unprepared for what happened to him, he earnestly describes all the problems and pitfalls (of which there are many; in fact the descriptions nearly put me off wanting to attain this state! Think of your body continuously burning internally with no means of respite and also being unable to eat even the smallest morsel of food without provoking a paroxysm of total bodily pain to get an idea.). However, with the aid of his wife- a women who is so selfless as to appear saintly-he realizes that the energy he has awoken has actually being awoken in the wrong channel (The pingala channel as opposed to the preferred ida. These channels are said to exist between the sexual organs and the top of the cranium and it is through the process of raising the Kundalini energy from the base of the body to the apex of the head that the experience of awakening occurs, physiologically speaking) and,then, making amends, soon enters the path to recovery and then advancement.

With each chapter or so, there is a “psychological commentary” by a James Hillman. However, from my impression this amounts to nought but the creation of a Jungian analysis for nearly everything Krishna experiences or, failing that, mentioning some obscure analogy to the experience according to alchemy or early-Greek thought. This entire process of contrived analogies get extremely tiresome and often, rather ludicrous. In my opinion, this exercise in itself is doomed to failure as one will find that most Western psychology and other similar disciplines are based exclusively upon a basis of rational analysis. Whereas Kundalini and other meditation techniques are based, not on logic or even intuition, but on direct experience of phenomena as they are, leading to firm experiences beyond the realm of the intellect. An effort to reconcile both without considering this is, to me, doomed from its very inception.

As the book progresses, we begin to see how Krishna’s life is altered and how both his consciousness and entire being radically alters in many unexpected ways. However, Krishna continuously stresses that that all of his experiences are in no way “magical” but, rather, nothing but the expected results of Kundalini energy working within , moulding his nervous system so as to evolutionarily advance. Throughout Krishna’s scientific approach accompanied with his honestly, integrity and almost total lack of ego are continuously inspiring. This is not his experience in so far as it is something all can achieve. Never does a sense of superiority creep in , nor does he even contemplate using his experiences to advance himself monetarily , even though he had many a chance to do so coupled with the fact that he was living in penury for quite a long time.

Gradually his life begins to stabilise at the level of advanced consciousness, whereupon Krishna gives his hope for mankind that all may awaken this fantastic energy, this: “ immortal light, held aloft by nature from time immemorial to guide the faltering footsteps of erring humanity across the turns and twists, ups and downs, of the winding path of evolution, the light which shone in the prophets and sages of antiquity, which continues to shine in the men of genius and seers of today, and will continue to shine for all eternity, illuminating the vast amphitheatre of the universe for the marvellous, unending play of the eternal, almighty, queen of creation, life”.

So poetic, so mysterious; Krishna’s book should be an inspiration to us all, and also a wake-up to those of us entrapped within the saddening emptiness of material based modern existence so that we can learn to look beyond the veal of this world so and thus , live. It is a well-written personal account of a supra-mundane accomplishment, and although it isn’t, to be truthful, the best book that I have ever read of this genre, I can ultimately say that it is a very worthwhile and insightful book. It deserves a wide readership.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Samantabhadra- a poem inspired by mushrooms

Apr. 19th, 2005 | 03:51 pm

Samantabhadra

We are all of the same
Differing only upon our level of perception
Of that which is , but what?
The rhythm of nature!
The rhythm the world dances to-
The primordial rhythm.

Were one entraped by vile fortunes,
The rhythm would still lie
Unperturbed, within.

It cannot be erased,degraded or eliminated
We must all reach it: it is our destiny!
There is nothing else to do!

All differ only according to their perception
Of this one and only truth.
Heaven nor Hell can touch it.
So, bring the mind home, and
Relentlessly reconnect!

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Revolutionary Buddhism

Mar. 15th, 2005 | 06:33 pm

Often, while contemplating upon the woes of the world ,upon the wars, the famines, the social injustices and, especially, the extreme environmental degradation and annihilation perpetrated each and every day, one can feel bemused as to why the world is as it is. In so far as, why do humans habitually act in the ways that they do? Further, the question regarding what can be done to alleviate these problems is also just as pressing. In this article, I hope to elucidate my belief that by learning and applying Buddhist ethics and understandings to the state of the world, one can truly understand the cause and effects of this world’s problem and, accordingly, work to then make a positive difference.

To begin, I must firstly state my belief that the external disorders seen both socially and in respect to the contemporary environmental “ecocide” are due to the collective internal disorders of our mind. These internal disorders or, “poisons of the mind” as they are described in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition are broken down into three factors, namely: ignorance, desire and hatred. Ignorance to the true effects of one’s actions and desire for monetary wealth, further possessions and for the appeasement of the ego leads to the perpetration of countless wrong actions that only further the suffering of the individual. It has often been said that one can be blinded by desire and this, most certainly, is often the case in our world. Certainly, desire can cause people to self-deceive themselves into rationalizing their behaviours. Hatred leads one to act in various unskilful ways, as it tends to destroy rationality. It can be said that ignorance is the root cause of desire and hatred, for if people really did understand the consequences of their actions( this being the realization that actions made, due to the poisons of the mind ,can never bring true happiness) they would simply not let desire and hatred reign in their minds.

To witness the three poisons in action, let us, firstly, consider the Iraq War. All but the most naïve individuals can realize that it was waged with the acquisition of oil being, if not the sole raison d’etre, but, at the very least, an important factor. Our fellow human beings were, in their thousands, murdered to acquire a non-renewable resource so that profit could be made from the its utilization(which, rather ironically, is in no small way responsible for Gaia’s greatest threat to continuation , Global Warming) . Desire blinded the war-mongers into deceiving themselves as to what occurs in a war. Hatred, as in all wars, was a prominent feature in the war’s conduct and, finally, ignorance to the fact that only compassion can ever really cause a change for the better ultimately led to the bombing and the bloodshed.

Another example of contemporary ignorance, yet one that is much more widespread is that to the media imbalance, or propaganda system in place that many commentators and renowned intellectuals such as Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman have delineated in many of their writings. By a complex process of non-conspiratorial but rather, self-deceptive actions, our media operates in a perverse manner so as to manufacture our consent to that of the dominant corporate agenda. We are always told about how balanced our media is but as Sharon Beder once wrote:

“Balance means ensuring that statements by those challenging the establishment are balanced with statements by those whom they are criticising, though not necessarily the other way round”

Often, certain stories are emphasized that in reality are trivial while more important or consequential stories are, if not omitted, then de-emphasised. We are told about the ruthlessness of Saddam Hussein’s regime in gory detail but on the fact that he was partly installed and then supported by the West for so long, we, sadly, don’t hear. "When truth is replaced by silence," as the Soviet dissident Yevgeny Yevtushenko said, "the silence is a lie."


These mental “poisons” are the fundamental problem of our world. No social initiatives or no amount of legislation can help us to foster real change unless we realize this concept. Noble philosophies such as Communism and Anarchy were created with great compassion as a method for creating a better world for all; and should be commended for these efforts. However, the reason that they have always practically failed is due to their lack of emphasis on personal revolution (by this I mean actions made against ones own mental “poisons”), instead, they see the problems of society as the “bourgeoisie”, or the state. Only by compassion, as the Buddha taught, can real change be achieved. There can be no permanent success with a violent revolution as, in the long run, it will only create more and more problems.

So what can we do to help to foster positive change in our world? As Chogyam Trungpa said:

“If we try and solve society’s problems without overcoming the confusion and aggression in our own state of mind, then our efforts will only contribute to the basic problems instead of solving them.”

However, we shouldn’t erroneously believe that we cannot do any good for the world until some distant time in the future when we are enlightened beings, as this, unfortunately, could take quite a while! We should, firstly, work upon ourselves, then - knowing that all the problems of the world are due to the three poisons, and that actions made by desire, hatred, and ignorance can only increase suffering for the individual- we should approach these worldly issues with compassion and empathy; all the time recognising that the same harmful factors exist in our own minds. Our battle for change should be as much internal as external. The process of demonizing the wrong doers, so beloved by many otherwise respectable commentators and organizations, has no place in a Buddhist approach to treating the world’s problems.

Recognizing the three poisons of the mind, we must now consider why we should always act with compassion in all situations even to those who fail to treat ourselves or others with compassion. The answer is remarkably simple, and Shantideva explains it as such in his marvellous work “Bodhicaryavatara”:

“Whatever joy there is in this world
All comes from desiring others to be happy
And whatever suffering there is in this world
All comes from desiring myself to be happy.”

Basically, by harbouring negative mental states and by treating people or the environment in a negative way or by concerning oneself solely with the acquisition of gain and pleasure for oneself, not only will no true happiness be gained, but, in actuality, suffering will result. Those who cause suffering to the planet and its inhabitants are also causing suffering to themselves. Thus, one who truly wishes to practice and express Buddhist ethics (or otherwise) must practice compassion and empathy to those people who commit wrongs. As David Edwards said, in his most remarkable book, “The Compassionate Revolution”:

“The rich then are as ignorant of the suffering they inflict on themselves as they are of the suffering they inflict on other people”

You cannot win over somebody by treating them with hatred and anger. In fact you are only causing suffering to yourself while achieving nothing but the reinforcement of the anger and hatred in that person whom you originally hoped to convince. This is why, in my opinion, so many noble organizations for positive change have failed to be effective in their campaigns. Yet, growing up in our world, this noble idea is incredibly hard to put into action, as it almost seems to go against all that is proper and noble(consider television, for example, where tales of “sweet” revenge and hatred directed to those who commit obvious wrongs are lauded-especially in the soap-operas!). This is why it is so revolutionary. In fact, compassion it is the only true revolutionary approach.

In conclusion, I would ask you, the reader, to investigate and challenge all that I have said and see whether or not you can find some truth in it. I must admit, that the process of dispelling the three poisons and also the act of putting compassion into action, in all situations, can be quite difficult(maybe, in fact, the most difficult task that there is!), and this I know only too well. Yet there are people who have done it.

I would now like to finish on a quote by H.H The Dalai Lama, a man who most effectively exemplifies what I believe to be the Buddhist approach to the world’s woes. A man who has practiced and promoted compassion and non-violence even throughout the Chinese invasion/genocide upon his homeland:
"If you want to change the world, first try to improve and bring about change within yourself. That will help change your family. From there it just gets bigger and bigger. Everything we do has some effect, some impact."

Link | Leave a comment {3} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Secondary Philanthropy

Jan. 26th, 2005 | 05:05 pm

Society now truly has a new idol to look up to. None other than Bill Gates. A philanthropic individual, who apparently cannot sleep at night due to his concerns for the unnecessary sufferings of others. Reading “The Guardian” today, the editor commented upon his huge financial donation to Gavi (Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation) of $75m a year for ten years. This might even prove to be “... a turning point in the fortunes of the most deprived of the world's continents.” Brilliant, it now seems that capitalism works fine and that everything is once again alright with the world. For as we all know, only too well, Third World problems are caused by bad-fortune, and it takes a billionaire Westerner of the likes of Gates to sort out these most unfortunate individuals.
So, Bill Gates then. How did he attain his vast wealth? Let us consider this. He set up a company called Microsoft. The ultimate capitalist enterprise. He embraced global capitalism to such a degree, in the development of his company that he is now under trial in Europe for infringements of anti-monopoly laws. He made millions by destroying others through anti-competitive business tactics. To stress this point further: he has accumulated billions from an unfair global system that allows for some to get incredibly rich while others starve. Every penny he has made had been by actively-more so in fact, one could say inspiring- this state of affairs.
Now many might not agree with my above detailing on the causes of global inequality but I ask you to allow me to explain, to shatter the myth. Africa and other so called “Third World” countries are not unlucky places with poor resources that are plagued by almost perpetual bad governance. They are exploited and manipulated places, which are conditioned by their ability to serve Western interests and maintain the almost mystical state of a good business environment. They are kept poor, while we, in the West, stay rich. Still unconvinced? Read anything by Chomsky or David Edwards for an infinitely more trenchant explanation of how the world works.
It is a perverse injustice that a billionaire can exist in this world while others die of malnutrition. It is a callous media distortion when a billionaire, an associate of the exploitative status quo, throws a few crumbs to the people he has exploited to be acclaimed by even such an ostensibly liberal newspaper as “The Guardian”.
Why should philanthropist, however good their intentions, have anything to do with the distributions of basic medical products such as vaccines? Should this not be the function of local Government and its Health Services? What will happen to these individuals once they are immunized? Will it solve all there problems? It all goes down to the basic premise of treating the cause or the effect. We in the West always choose the latter, because it allows us to self-deceive ourselves into believing that we can continue living our lives as normal while also giving us the impression that we are really helping those in need. Is it not bizarre that this Mr Bill Gates has made billions by selling computer software? Yet half the world hasn’t even got access to a telephone. If there is a more lucid example of inequality, I would be suprized to hear it.
I am inclined to see this donation as being what I call secondary philanthropy. Secondary in so far as, not only is this donation of no loss to him, but it is impossible in our system to amass so much money without partaking in the very un- philanthropic act of exploitation. It is not the preserve of the rich to give some of their money whenever they feel like it. It is the preserve of global sanity that nobody should be in a position to do anything of the likes. The fact that none of the major media organisations picked up on this is an outrage and I feel inclined to inveigh against this. As Voltaire once said:
“As long as people believe in absurdities, they will continue to commit atrocities. “

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

On the existence of evil

Jan. 8th, 2005 | 03:28 pm

On the existence of evil

I must primarily state here that my opinion on the existence of human evil is in no way immutable. Evil is certainly one of humanities most intractable subjects and I do not yet feel that I can make a satisfactory and tenable argument in support or against its existence. Thus, what I will do is to surmise the book “People of the Lie” by Dr Scott Peck for you. This book- of which I have spoken to you of- is written in favour of the existence of human evil as an actual human condition.
The basic proposition of this book is that certain people are not merely ill (from a psychiatric point of view) but, in fact, are manifestly evil. “People of the lie” is the phrase he uses to describe such evil people. This theory is based on a legion of documentary evidence and case studies of some patients that he has personally encountered. Dr Peck doesn’t believe, however, that one should make a moral judgement on people who are deemed to be evil. In fact, he sees this as one of the dangers of his book. He believes that by labelling someone as evil; their condition can be better understood and then appropriately treated. In affect he calls for us to recognise the existence of evil so that we can create a method of healing it.
One of the author’s main inspirations for writing the book, and a man who helped to form many of his opinions is Erich Fromm. Fromm has made the study of Nazism his lifelong work and in this book the author describes the characteristics of so called “evil” people as attributed to him. He claims that there are certain characteristics that evil people, without exception, possess. “Malignant narcissism”; the wish to control others and the lack of submission to a higher principle are the three main ones described. I will now explain these traits further.
The wish to control others is rather self-evident and needs no further explanation. The lack of submission to a higher principle is a universal trait among the pathologically “evil”. This might sound rather strange but if you think about it all people do surrender in one form or another to a higher principle. This can take the form of following Gods’ will, following a set of morals/ethics or even abiding by your own conscience. Practically, this means feeling guilty when an action you take isn’t in proper accordance with whatever your higher principle is.
“Malignant narcissism” is a broad and universal trait which both the author and Fromm have noticed among all those that they have identified as “evil”. Narcissism is a trait that we all possess as children and that, during normal development, we lose to a lesser or greater extent as we mature. For some reason, “evil” people seem to have never matured beyond this stage. According to Fromm, we reach this stage by making a continuous serious of self-absorbed decisions. He claims that “ our capacity to choose changes constantly with our practice of life”.
People are not born “evil”, nor do they become “evil” in an arbitrary manner. It is through the choices that they make in life that affects what will happen to them. An example of this is as follows:
Suppose I always make my decisions based on the greater good of humanity. I will always choose my friends over myself, my family over my own selfish interests and humanity over self-gratification. I can only do this by making a series of choices. Eventually I will find it extremely difficult to choose the desirable over the less desirable choice. The opposite is true for the “evil” people who chose the narcissistic path.
Group evil, the scourge of the twentieth century is also discussed at length. Many salient truths-of which I am in total agreement- are detailed on this in the book. This is something that I would suppose you would find particularly interesting considering your study of human genocide. I am not going to go into detail here but I will list two frightening examples of how humans can easily be corrupted in a group scenario.
People will commit evil with remarkable ease under obedience. The clearest example of this is based on the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. Faced with an imposing, close-at-hand commander, sixty-five percent of his adult subjects would fully obey given instructions. On command they would deliver electric shocks to what appeared to be a screaming, traumatized innocent victim in an adjacent room. They knew what they were doing was wrong but they still done it anyway under command. They sacrificed their morals for obedience.
Secondly, the story of corrupted children in the book “The Lord of the Flies” has been scientifically verified by psychological studies conducted on twelve-year old male campers in the US. According to an article by the psychologist David Myers, when these children were left without restraining adult leadership and encouraged to compete in groups with one another, the benign competition soon developed into violent “warfare on a twelve-year old scale”.
I put these points forward for your consideration. In my opinion, maybe, there is a divide between those evil doers who are reconcilable and those that aren’t. Are psychopaths intrinsically evil? Many say yes, but is it their fault? Are there some endogenous causes (i.e. genetic reasons) for human “evil”? To these questions I remain ambivalent. The only thing I can abide by is the ancient saying: “ Hate the sin, love the sinner”.

Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend