sentienthing ([info]sentienthing) wrote,
@ 2007-10-02 19:20:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Article written for Mediscope mag
 

Climate change and public health

 

  There are few contemporary issues as ubiquitous as that of climate change1, 2. Yet, even with all this coverage of its current and potential implications, we are in a rather peculiar situation insofar as real action on it seems extremely slow if not completely absent. Seemingly, we are in a state of denial towards a problem that, if left unchecked, could lead to a catastrophe on par with nuclear war3!  

 

 What is the correlation between this and medicine however, you may be asking? The answer is that climate change cannot be separated from its public health implications. People are already suffering from its effects and the future impact has been predicted to include changing food production worldwide and associated malnutrition; an increase in tropical diseases and waterborne illnesses and a generally increased worldwide burden of illness4 We in the UK will also be unable to escape the effects5 and it will be our generation of medical students that will have to treat those affected.

 

 This leads to the question: what can we do? Firstly, and most importantly, we must realize that there is still scope for change as, unlike many other public health issues, we have the possibility to hugely mitigate the effects of this potential disaster. However, this action must occur now; and this is why action on climate change carries with it such a sense of urgency. As terrible as all this sounds there is hope as we have the potential to actually at best stop, and, at worst, reduce this problem. In fact, I think we have a duty to do something about this problem as by ignoring it we are in fact accepting it.

 

 What can we as medical students then do to tackle the causes of climate change? It is easy to believe that individual actions such as cutting back on driving and/or buying local are solutions but one mustn’t be fooled into thinking that, laudable as these practices are, they will ever address a problem as huge as this. The only solution to a global problem like this is governmental action and government action that starts today. This could start by supporting the BMJ in its call for the implementation of a worldwide policy of carbon contraction and convergance2 or by joining pressure groups for change such as I count or Medact6. For further reading on policies for change in the UK I would recommend reading the report “Zero Carbon Britain”, produced by CAT7. Any action, we must remember, is better than no action.

 

 This summer I personally tried to do something by attending the Camp for Climate Action8 by Heathrow Airport which was set up to highlight the hypocrisy of a government that encourages us to change our light bulbs to more energy efficient ones whilst continuing to expand airports (the biggest growing contributor to Carbon emissions in the UK9). Many environmental activists as well as climate scientists and concerned people gathered to discuss strategies for change all demonstrating many differing ideas at how to avert this disaster. From my experience there, I have realized the ideas for change are abundant and that all we need is action.

 

 Climate change is but one example of our ruinous relationship with the natural environment but it is the most important element of it as it has the potential to fundamentally alter the viability of life on this planet. As future doctors we will be in a unique position to influence policy making in our respective areas and it is my view that this is why we should treat Climate change as the most pressing issue that there is. The clock is ticking but, even still, we shouldn’t underestimate the power that we have to effect the future direction of our planet. The quality of life of future generations and their health is very much in our hands.

 

 

1)       The anthropogenic basis of climate change is no longer debated within the scientific community; please see report of the Royal Society. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/downloaddoc.asp?id=1630

2)       Stott, Godlee. What should we do about climate change? Health Professions need to act now both collectively and individually. BMJ  2006;333:983-984 (11 November)

3)       Comparison made in the most recent report of the International Institute for Strategic Studies. http://www.iiss.org.uk/

4)       WHO climate and health fact sheet. http://www.who.int/globalchange/news/fsclimandhealth/en/index.html.

5)       Parliamentary office of Science and Technology report. UK Health Implication of Climate Change http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/POSTpn232.pdf)

6)       See http://www.icount.org.uk/ or http://www.medact.org/

7)       CAT is the Centre for Alternative Technology and their report can be seen at http://www.zerocarbonbritain.com/ 

8)       Website for the Camp for Climate Action. http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/

9)       Tyndall Centre for climate change research report: “Contraction and convergence UK Carbon emissions and the implications for UK air traffic”. http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/research/theme2/final_reports/t3_23.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




(Post a new comment)

climate change and human health
(Anonymous)
2007-10-03 09:01 am UTC (link)
What a load of absolute tosh. Read the history of Europe in the Little Ice Age if you want to see the impact of climate on human health.
Failed harvests, famine, and pestilence, villages destroyed by advancing glaciers in the Alps. This is established recorded fact, not some unsupportable computer simulation. If the money being spent world wide on supposed global warming, estimated at some $50 billion since 1988, had been spent on clean water supplies, cheap energy and vaccination, just think of the impovements to public health in developing countries that could have been made.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: climate change and human health
[info]refusetobeaman
2007-10-03 04:55 pm UTC (link)
Although you are anonymous and probably won't see this, I'd like to make a few points.

The thing about the future is you have to use computer simulations - because it's not happened yet.

That $50billion (a rather poxy sum over the space of 20 years, when compared to other sectors, including the ones that contribute to climate change) has been spent on dealing with climate change has no bearing on what is spent on improving the lives of the ultra-poor. You imply there is only one little pot of money.

The little ice age argument? Welcome to 2007. This hockey stick stuff has been long discredited.

Even if you can't be convinced that extreme weather can have a bearing on human health (floods and draughts must merely inconvenience you), then perhaps you can see that the things which cause climate change also have a direct impact on our health. Let's take road transport as an example. Transport accidents kill about 1.2million around the world every year (mainly in poor countries). The health problems that cars hasten with air pollution kill additional millions every year as well (including around 39,000 people in the UK).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Response by Jim Clarke
(Anonymous)
2007-10-03 10:53 pm UTC (link)
Can you name one person killed by air pollution from automobiles? No. I didn't think so. It is all just computer simulations based on unfounded assumptions.

Now ask yourself how many people have lived fuller healthier lives because of the burning of fossil fuels? It helps us grow and deliver the food we need to feed the billions. It produces the electricity that keeps our food supply safe, keeps us cool in the summer and warm in the winter. It runs the computers that have been used to advance medicine by leaps and bounds, and powers the machines that build the infrastructure that brings us clean water and cleans up our used water. It powers our civilizations that ultimately keep 'tropical' diseases from spreading, regardless of the temperature.

Climate change has been with us since before we walked upright. Primitive man at least had the sense to adapt to those changes. It is only modern man that is stupid enough to think he can control the climate and prevent it from changing.

Now ask yourself, what has caused more misery in the last 100 years, our 'unprecedented' climate change or leaders asking the populace to sacrifice their rights and/or wealth for some cause the leader(s) proclaims as noble? The latter is many magnitudes greater! Now you want us to put our trust in the government again?

Climate change will happen regardless of what we do. For the health of the biosphere, global warming is far better than equal amounts of global cooling. Either way, it is much easier and less expensive to adapt to the change than to try and control it, which is impossible.

Finally, over the next 3 decades we will (unfortunately) experience global cooling, as ocean cycles and solar cycles enter their 'cool' phases, greatly overwhelming the minuscule warming effect of increasing CO2. That is what one learns if one looks at ALL the peer reviewed science and not just the cherry-picked articles of the IPCC and the Royal society.

The efforts of modern environmentalists will lead to nothing but harm and hardship for humans while providing no benefit for the rest of the biosphere.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Response by Jim Clarke
[info]refusetobeaman
2007-10-04 01:35 pm UTC (link)
Can I name one person? No. If you look at levels of pollution and look at numbers of people with asthma et al, is there a relationship? Yes. "Unfounded" indeed, and "just a theory" too I suppose. How many doctors do you think would agree with you? Not a majority.

Fossil fuels have benefited us greatly. What has that got to do with the science of climate change though?

Climate change is natural. Global warming is natural. Nobody denies that. We know we need them. We just think we can affect them.

Not much has happened with climate change compared to what may well and is now happening. Yes, governments can screw their people. Again, I ask, what has that got to do with the science? Furthermore I am not asking anyone to trust the government, I am asking them to challenge them. If you seriously think governments wouldn't rather ignore the problem then look at the total lack of action they've taken so far.

Less expensive? Did you even miss the Stern Report?

I never mentioned the IPCC or the Royal Society. Just what pear reviewed journals did you read that argued this amazing stuff?

Yes, fossil fuel helps us feed many more people and bring us great comforts. But it is possible to do without most of the less essential comforts and still make massive emissions cuts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Response by Jim Clarke
[info]sentienthing
2007-12-07 11:11 pm UTC (link)
Hi,

It is great to read such an unscientific rant based on nothing but self serving opinion. Particularily loved the idea that the IPCC and Royal Society are "cherry picking"... Absolutely absurd.

A famous scientific report entitled , " Beyond the ivory tower" (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686) done a study on the scientific consensus upon climate change. In it is tested the belief amoung scientists for an anthropogenic role in climate change. Here is what was discovered:


"The 928 papers were divided into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position. Of all the papers, 75% fell into the first three categories, either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view; 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change. Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position."

The debate is over. Denial will get you nowhere.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]refusetobeaman
2007-10-03 05:02 pm UTC (link)
Thank you for posting this! I have always thought it weird that medical people don't seem more interested in environmental issues. Would you mind if I linked to this journal page in my own journal?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sentienthing
2007-12-07 11:03 pm UTC (link)
No prob, go for it!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…